April 24th, 2007

CBS Radio Suspends Local Hosts

The Associated Press reported today that CBS Radio suspended two local hosts after they twice broadcasted a racially charged prank call that targeted employees at a Chinese restaurant.

The hosts of the daily morning show, WFNY-FM’s “The Dog House With JV and Elvis,” have been suspended “until further notice” without pay, CBS Radio spokeswoman Karen Mateo said Tuesday. One of the hosts, Jeff Vandergrift, apologized twice on Monday’s show, she said.

Local chapters of the Organization of Chinese Americans, an advocacy group, released a statement Sunday protesting the segment. In the segment, broadcast on April 5 and again last week, a caller to a Chinese restaurant intersperses an order for takeout with lewd language and racial slurs.

The caller tells one female employee he wants to come to the restaurant to see her naked and refers to a part of her body as “hot, Asian, spicy.”

The caller attempts to order “shrimp flied lice” and refers to a male employee as “Chinese man” before claiming himself to be a student of kung fu.

At one point he refers to a part of the employee’s body as a “tiny egg roll.”

The show’s hosts, Vandergrift and Dan Lay, have been campaigning online and on the air in support of Imus since his firing for making sexist and racist comments about the Rutgers University women’s basketball team.

My Thoughts:

What we are witnessing is not a sudden change to more vitriolic content on free radio air waves throughout our country. Instead, what we are witnessing is simply its effect in the form of backlash from those who refuse to be bullied. Shows that thrive on over the top comedy tend to spiral out of control as each joke has to be more memorable than the last.

I’ve listened to Imus supporters and those that would otherwise ignore the potential dangers of such language in the media. Their response is that the jokes are harmless and generally accepted by the masses.

Yet, what they fail to acknowledge is that no one has the right to judge the harshness of ethnic, gender and or sexual based “Tom foolery” other than those that find themselves the brunt of these jokes. In other words, a joke is only as mean as they make the victim feel.

You cannot tell me that a joke about an American African or a Puerto Rican is not harmless just because it doesn’t harm YOU. To imply otherwise is self-centered and insensitive to the feelings of others. After all, this is what the entire discussion is really about – having consideration for others.

People throw around the term Politically Correct as though it’s some disease created by those voters left of center. The truth is that Political Correctness is nothing more than common decency and respect disguised in the cloak of politically acceptable jargon.

Critics lash out and claim that Americans are too sensitive these days. They say this as if they would prefer the glory days of the Jim Crow south or the highly concentrated urban ghettos (that are even more concentrated in the 21st century by the way).

Some radio listeners support broadcasts that rarely touch upon anything of value (other than to their advertisers) and yet somehow it is the fault of the targets of these senseless broadcasts?

Now to be fair, I have not listened to “The Dog House with JV and Elvis” so I cannot comment about that specific show. I will tell you however, that in my experience, shows that use pranks, like the one they pulled, rarely provide anything other than early to mid - morning entertainment for caffeine deprived commuters.

As a person of color, I have developed rather thick skin as a result of many cultural based verbal battles. I recognize that not all jokes are mouthed with malice. So you may ask: when do you draw the line? When does humor go too far?

My immediate response would have to do with knowing your audience. I think a conversation amongst friends is allowed to have a different tone than that of free radio. Friends tend to have a better understanding of the true intent of each others’ words and often feel comfortable enough to speak up when offended.

Unfortunately, some radio show hosts abuse their platform and allow their speech to betray what should be thought of as a friendship with their potential listeners. Without respecting that boundary, hosts will find the answer to the question ‘when do you draw the line’ too late. The only way people like this will really understand is for those insulted to speak up for themselves.

The women and the American African community were outraged with Imus and now the American Chinese are voicing outrage with this recently reported incident.

I support the opinions and feelings of the Organization of Chinese Americans. The punishment for those two disc jockeys seems justified.

April 22nd, 2007

Davidson: Dropping Student Debt

davidson_logo.gif

Late last quarter, NPR.org Education writer Elaine Korry wrote about Davidson College’s effort to eliminate student loan debt for its graduates. The article discuss what may be a new trend for private institutions hoping to gain a broader student base by attracting those that otherwise might not apply due to high tuition costs.

I thought this was very interesting and have decided to share the article:

Davidson College, a liberal arts school near Charlotte, N.C., is adjusting its need-based financial aid programs to eliminate student loans.

Instead, the school plans to pump up its endowment and offer students who need financial help more grants and jobs.
President Robert Vagt wants to make a Davidson education accessible to more students whose parents don’t have $120,000 saved for their educations.

“When they look at the price, they don’t even apply,” Vagt said. “And what this will mean is that students will begin applying to Davidson who in the past had thought, ‘there’s no way my family can do $40,000 a year.’”
At Davidson, 26 percent of the school’s 1,700 students received loans to help pay the more than $38,000 it costs for tuition, room, board and books.

In 2004/2005, the most recent figures available from the U.S. Department of Education, their debt burden averaged more than $8,000 a year.

Nationwide, 65 percent of college graduates made it through without taking out any student loans, according to the U.S. Department of Education.

Davidson had previously taken steps toward easing the potential for high student debt. In this school year, student loans were limited to $3,000 a year.

Vagt said the decision may have started as a moral choice, but it wouldn’t have succeeded without support from the Board of Trustees.

“Commitments by the trustees themselves to help fund this over the interim period, and they adopted a plan which will raise the endowment over the next four years, to permanently finance it,” Vagt said.

Princeton University and Columbia University have implemented similar policies. Some major public colleges, such as the University of North Carolina, have done so for students from families with modest incomes. Davidson is the first small, liberal arts school to take this step.

Terry Hartle, with the American Council on Education, says it’s a welcome step for parents, but it’s also a smart business decision.
“This is a terrific marketing move,” Hartle said. “Davidson is a very highly respected private college, but it’s not necessarily well-known outside the Southeast. This will give it a great deal of national attention, and I would suspect that next year they will see thousands more applicants than they are seeing this year.”

Hartle says many small liberal arts colleges would love to follow Davidson’s lead, but few have the financial wherewithal to pull it off.