State legislators voted Wednesday to award $5 million to compensate an innocent man who spent 18 years in prison.
The House and Senate unanimously approved the settlement with James Calvin Tillman, 45, who was freed a year ago after DNA evidence exonerated him of a rape in Hartford.
“I felt like everyone cared, and everyone understood,” Tillman said.
Gov. M. Jodi Rell publicly apologized to Tillman in February on behalf of the state. After the unanimous vote, legislators responded to their dismay over the legal system in this matter.
“I’ll never vote for the death penalty again,” Sen. Edith Prague, D-Columbia, told Tillman after the 33-0 vote in the Senate. “This did it for me.”
Sen. Ed Gomes, D-Bridgeport, called Tillman the most gracious man he had ever met.
“If this had happened to me, I would hate the world for the rest of my life,” Gomes said.
Tillman, the first prisoner to be freed through the efforts of the Connecticut Innocence Project, was said to have handled the compensation process graciously.
Rep. Kenneth Green, D-Hartford, a sponsor of the bill, said the $5 million, which will not be subject to state taxes, was calculated after a review of wrongful imprisonment cases across the nation.
According to Mark Pazniokas and Colin Poitras of The Harftord Courant, the settlement will resolve all claims from Tillman, who also had claimed he was the victim of medical malpractice while incarcerated.
James Tillman has been serving as vice president for ministry for the Hopewell Baptist Church since his release.
What the papers have failed to recognize in this case is that the Governor of Connecticut originally offered Tillman $500,000 in compensation for his wrongful incarceration…$500,000? That amounts to what would have been an annual salary of $27,777 over 18 years.
Now, I’m not sure what Mr. Tillman was doing prior to being falsely imprisoned but I would venture to say that $5,000,000 is a more reasonable compensation for having to give up so many years of one’s life.
The news of Tillman’s wrongful conviction begs the question, how many more men have lost their lives to a legal system that has been unjust to them? I’m sure the state Innocence Project has new life today as it continues its quest to use DNA and modern technology to exonerate accused men.
ABOUT JAMES CALVIN TILLMAN
[source: Wikipedia]
James Calvin Tillman is an African-American man who served 18 years in prison for a rape which he did not commit. Tillman, of East Hartford Connecticut, was convicted of kidnapping in the first degree, sexual assault in the first degree, robbery and assault in the third degree and larceny in the second degree in 1989.
The charges resulted from an attack on a white woman in Hartford, Connecticut that occurred on January 22, 1988. The victim entered her car in an outdoor parking lot at approximately 12:45 A.M. after leaving a bar. Her attacker opened the driver’s side door of her car and attempted to enter. When she resisted he punched her in the face repeatedly. The attacker then raped her and then ran off with her purse and jewelry.
Tillman appealed the conviction in the Supreme Court of Connecticut in 1991 (220 Conn. 487, 600 A.2d 738). The Supreme Court upheld the conviction finding that the jury array was not unconstitutionally assembled, alleged errors in jury instruction did not warrant a new trial and certain field notes were not improperly excluded from evidence[1].
Tillman argued that the jury selection was improper because court clerks had excused a number of potential jurors due to financial hardship. He claimed that the minority candidates were more likely to face this hardship and that this contributed to the fact that there were no African American males on his jury. The court noted that in a murder trial that drew from the same array there were three black persons chosen to serve.
Tillman also raised several issues regarding instructions to the jury. When considering the victims testimony he had requested that the jury be told that they “may consider…whether the witness was physically impaired or under stress when observing the perpetrator.” [2] The jury might have found the victim to have been impaired due to the facts that she had been drinking and that she had a large cut over her eye that required seven stitches and eventually closed the eye completely. The court instead instructed the jury that it could assess the victims “ability to observe facts correctly…degree of stress…and opportunity to observe the person.” [3] In addition he challenged the court’s decision not to limit his own contradictory statement to a police detective. The detective testified that he asked Tillman how he got some cuts and bruises on the major knuckles of his hands. The defendant originally said that he was not sure but later said that he did not get them from “punching no girl”[4]. The Detective had not told Tillman that the victim had been punched; however he had shown him a picture of the girl after her attack from which he could reasonably deduce that fact. Tillman was not allowed to raise this point on appeal.
The final argument in Tillman’s appeal was that the court had improperly excluded a notebook containing field notes from a police department social worker. The notes did not pass proper evidentiary requirements. Within the notes was a statement from the lead Detective on the case indicating that fingerprints not matching Tillman’s were found on the drivers side door of the vehicle where the perpetrator had entered. The finding was reported in court as being fingerprints on the passenger side door.
Tillman’s verdict was affirmed in 1991 and again in 1999 when he claimed ineffective assistance of counsel before the Appellate Court of Connecticut (54 Conn.App. 749, 738 A.2d 208).The main holding in that case was that counsel did not have to press every conceivable argument during a case but should focus on a few strong arguments[5].
In 2007 DNA testing was performed on semen found on the victim’s pantyhose. After serving 18 years of a 45 year sentence, James Calvin Tillman was exonerated for the crime that he did not commit. The testing proved that he was innocent. Tillman’s case was investigated by the Innocence Project which works to fee wrongfully convicted men through DNA evidence. The organization has helped almost 200 inmates prove their innocence. Over 60 percent of those exonerated have been black men convicted of raping white women[6].
James Tillman has been serving as vice president for ministry for the Hopewell Baptist Church since his release. The Governor of Connecticut offered him $ 500,000 in compensation for his wrongful incarceration. Several members of the state legislature have introduced a bill to provide Tillman with total compensation of $ 5,000,000 for the 18 years that he wrongfully spent in jail.[7].
On May 16, 2007 the Connecticut legislature unanimously voted to present Tillman with $5 million to assist him in living comfortably following his wrongful imprisonment. The legislature stated that they were touched by his attitude following his release.[8]
References
1. ^ State v. Tillman, 220 Conn. 487, 600 A.2d 738, at 489,490 (1991)
2. ^ id. at 500
3. ^ id.
4. ^ id at 503
5. ^ Tillman v. Commissioner of Correction,54 Conn. App. 749, 738 A.2d 208, at 758 (1999)
6. ^ Stan Simpson, Injustice Heaped on Black Men,Hartford Courant, April 7, 2007
7. ^ Colin Poitras, Judiciary Panel Cleans Its Legislative Plate: Modified Adoption Bill Voted Down,Hartford Courant, April 14, 2007
8. ^ Susan Haigh, Conn. to give exonerated man $5M, Associated Press, May 17, 2007.
Save This Page
